| Upcoming: Fixed #2 Launch Party, LFGSS Xmas Party |
| | #1 |
| | i know this cropped up in a different thread before, with the red moser, but what are the opinions on converting classic vintage road frames? (none of this 'a kitten gets its face ripped off everytime you file off a braze-on' schtick please). nb: by 'classic vintage' i mean moser, colnago, hetchins, etc. for example - i like matt's TJ Quick. i think it looks darn good. |
| quote reply |
| | #5 |
| | I think people get too precious, I wouldn't go grinding stuff off, but why not run fixed if you want to? a lot of road frames represent excellent geometry for a road fixed. I'm not a fan of forward facing dropouts, but they do work. Personally, I'd want something modern to run gears. for me that means long distance + speed. and I'd want lightweight, smooth gears and carbon! |
| quote reply |
| | #6 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| quote reply |
| | #18 |
| | i agree with RPM and andy - those classic frames were designed for the road and arguably make better street fixes than than track bikes. People used to strip the gears off and ride fixed for winter before it became trendy - it's no big deal. I wouldn't go as far as changing drop outs for ends - a bit like getting a knee transplant imo. i used to have a tommasini which I converted a few years ago (no changes to the frame though) - I always knew it was a nice frame, but I didn't realise until last year how people get so worked up about vintage this and classic that. All I knew was that the lightest new bikes were aluminium and carbon, but if i stripped the hardware off my bike it would it very light and go like the clappers. |
| quote reply |
| | #31 | ||
| | Quote:
I stand corrected. | ||
| quote reply |