| Upcoming: Vote to host the EHBPC, LFGSS Xmas Party |
| | #1 |
| | Mis-matched wheels If there is a practical reason for this, or whether its just an aesthetic thing? Not havng yet a huge grasp on the track bike thang, I'm aware of solid rear wheels on TT/Track bikes with more conventional wheels upfront, but I'm seeing bikes with deep rims at back/front with something completely different up front, carbon wheels at the back, carbon (aerospoke right?) at the front etc Some one give me an in into the wonderful world of wheel selection on a fixie (and I even managed some alliteration) |
| quote reply |
| | #2 |
| | well. err.. most people cant afford 2 arrospoks, so just have the one. coming from a BMX/MTB background, having 2 odd rims isnt soo uncommon. a lighter one on the front, and a stronger/heavier one on the back. Dont think that is relevant with street trackbikes though. |
| quote reply |
| | #3 |
| | ^fail. mismatched wheels is because fixed wheel bikes dont need a rim-brake on the rear. So you can put an unmachined rear, such as a brightly coloured deep profile on the rear o display your "fixieness" to all other riders (who are obviously inferior to you as they ride with a freewheel). We basically have a repressed inferiority complex. If you're doing tricks, then a much stronger rim up front will help - hence the love/hate relationship with the arrospok. |
| quote reply |
| | #14 |
| | No reason for it other than fashion victim. If you need a stronger wheel up front for tricks then just get a flatland bmx and learn how to do proper tricks - too hard? thought so :-) I think mis-matched looks awful but that probably says more about my mind wanting symmetry in everything and not a good trait! |
| quote reply |
| | #17 |
| | I think that a more aero wheel on the back seems to be the way of the pros both road riders and track riders alike, though by the time it has gotten past your front wheel, frame, trainers, toe clips, straps and jeans I would doubt it makes any noticeable difference to your average city rider. Plus sitting pretty upright on risers wearing a shirt isn't the most aero technique either. On a technie note M.I.T. did some wind tunnel tests and found that in terms of aerodynamics one's head and helmet is by far the most problematic area and that from a saving energy point of view you are more efficient with a £200 TT helmet and normal wheels than an normal helmet and a £5000 set of dimpled carbon disks. That said I do really like the way odd wheels look on the right set-up (and nick's(?) Memphisesque Aerospoke was amzingly nice.) Oh and a fixed gear is a gear you can't change, singlespeed, BMX, cruiser or what have you, a fixed wheel is a wheel which is not free ie a track wheel. I always thought a fixie was a road bike which had been fixed whilst a track bike is well... |
| quote reply |
| | #20 |
| | Almost all bikes benefit from having mismatched wheels, or at least mismatched spoke-count. A rear wheel on any bicycle has to deal with driving forces, while the front doesnt. On many bikes the weight is biased twards the rear wheel also, this all puts greater strain on the rear wheel than the front. On any quality bike they take this into account and put more spokes on the rear than the front to deal with this, also appropriate lacing pattern for the wheel. On fixed wheels, especially those for the street. The rear wheel has to not only deal with driving forces but also contra rotating braking forces. Putting twice as much strain on the wheel. This calls for 3x or 4 x lacing, high spoke count, and a stronger rim than the front. Also, deep rims/disc wheels reduce air drag, but are susceptible to crosswinds. For this reason its better to have them on your more stable rear end than on the front where a disc would completely fuck up your steering (with a breeze). Modern mountain bikes use the same spoke & rim combo on front and rear as they both take a lot of impact and have to be strong, also hub-braking causes as much torsional forces as the drivetrain so a similar spoke count and lacing is required. |
| quote reply |
| | #29 |
| Blog Entries: 4 | "On a technie note M.I.T. did some wind tunnel tests and found that in terms of aerodynamics one's head and helmet is by far the most problematic area and that from a saving energy point of view you are more efficient with a £200 TT helmet and normal wheels than an normal helmet and a £5000 set of dimpled carbon disks." if people just learned to ride on the drops more instead of holding onto the shiny bit of bare metal either side of the stem they would gain more efficiency than any aero rim/helmet could give them. |
| quote reply |