Grandass, I know what I'm talking about - and don't need to get all torpid to make my point.

not only is digital better technically, but it's better subjectively - I stand by what I said: it's in the glass, try repairing a negative, you learn more, shoot more, spend less.

proof:

1. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...shootout.shtml

2. Lichfield saved £80,000 a year going digital.

pwn